Morphy thought little of his success with
blindfold play, dismissing it with the remark that "It proves
nothing." However, in Bretano's Chess Monthly of June 1881,
Falkbeer expressed the opinion.
...that memory is the main factor of success in playing blind games.
And, of Morphy's gigantic memory, I had the indubitable proof from my
own observation at the time he was playing his celebrated match with
Löwenthal. Both opponents had agreed to regard the games as their
intellectual private property, not to be published.
I was at the time editing the Chess Column of the
London Sunday Times, and anxious to reproduce them there. In
order to obtain the requisite information, I had to apply to one of the
contesting parties. I first went to Morphy, who received me most
cordially, and declared his entire willingness to dictate to me the last
partie, played the day before. I begged him to repeat the game on
the board, as I would, in this manner, be better able to follow the
progress of the contest. Morphy consented, and, at the 10th move of
black (Löwenthal), I asked him to stop a moment, since it seemed to me
that at this particular point, a better move might have been made.
"Oh, you probably mean the move which you yourself made in one of your
contests with Drufresne?" answered Morphy in his simple, artless way of
speaking. I was startled. The partie mentioned had been played in
Berlin in 1851, seven years before, and I had totally forgotten all its
details. On observing this, Morphy called for a second board, and began,
without the least hesitation, to repeat that game from the first to the
last move without making a single mistake. I was speechless from
surprise. Here was a man, whose attention was consistantly distracted by
countless demands on his memory, and yet he had perfectly retained for
seven years all the details of a game insignificant in itself, and,
moreover, printed in a language and and description unknown to him. (The
game was published in the Berliner Schachzeitung of 1851!)
|