| 
 
 
André  Breton and Nicolas Calas, two poets, collaborated on this piece (the 
one shown is a reconstruction from a descriptive article). Its simply 
construction might have something to do with the fact that the creators weren't 
trained artists, or that they were following traditional Dada ideas of using 
found object. Its whimsical design, some suggest, relate to Breton's well-known 
distaste for Chess. 
 
                              
André  Breton                                                                          
Nicolas Calas 
                     
                                                
  
  
  
The Christmas Day edition of Newsweek in 1944 
described this collaboration - 
    
      
        
          
Cockeyed Chess: On the prankster side, though, is 
the concoction of 
the surrealist writers Nicolas Calas and André Breton (whose manifesto of 1924 
launched the official surrealist movement). These two think chess a useless 
foolish game—and narcissistic besides. Their hoard is made up of mirrors so that 
the "narcissistic" players can see 
themselves, and the chessmen are ordinary drinking glasses of various 
sizes and shapes, the "blacks" filled with red wine, the "whites" 
with white wine. When a player captures a piece he "must drink the 
symbolic blood of the victim." Breton and Calas have also hung a 
proclamation on chess called "Profanation" as what they sum up: "The 
game should be changed, not the pieces." 
           
         
       
 
  
  
    
      | 
       Profanation 
      Chess is hand-to-hand combat between two 
      labyrinths. 
       
      An integral weakness of chess is that it does not lend itself to 
      divination (there is no checkomancy) 
       
      The Christian Church has never banned the game of chess, though it did ban 
      dice and cards. 
       
      In order to be a good chess player, One should not be overly intelligent.— 
      Jean Jacques Rousseau: Diderot did not play very well and readily 
      acknowledged the superiority of Rousseau, who never failed to heat him. 
       
      Modern warfare is an advanced form of chess, hut most of its pieces are 
      obsolete. 
       
      The "queen" in chess is a suspicious character. The ease with which she 
      moves over the battlefield would have von think that she is a general in 
      drag. 
       
      A woman is too lonely with a chess player. (cf. Marcel Duchamp, Joueurs 
      d'echecs [Chess Players], 1911.) The real Queen, which we still 
      await—in chess as elsewhere—is the one foreseen by Barthelemy Prosper 
      Enfantin, the head of the Saint-Simonian religion (1796—1864). 
       
      The only legitimate game is one that would allow, for either player, only 
      those combinations of moves that have never been attempted before. 
       
      Philosophical freedom is an illusion. In chess as in all other games, each 
      move is loaded with the indefinite past of the universe. 
       
      So as to eschew any sense of greatness in competition, one would do) well 
      to acknowledge being a part of a pyramid of monkey heads. 
       
      One element of ancient wisdom we might hold in mind is that deprecatory 
      voice that the triumphant general in his chariot kept hearing. 
       
      Only inspiration is in control, day and night: All in all, not every 
      calculation is an analysis: a chess player, for instance, does the one ver 
      well without doing the other.—Baudeiaire 
       
      The real Napoleon (the killer) was a mediocre chess player. In Lenin's 
      tomb on the Red Square, von xviii find a chess hoard (is it the beginning 
      of a game or one left unfinished?) and fishing floats. On the other hand 
      (it is only fair to mention it), two great artistic innovators—Marcel 
      Duchamp, Raymond Roussel—brought new solutions to some chess problems. 
       
      The game of chess is not enough of a game; it is too serious an 
      entertainment .—Montaigne 
       
      What must he changed is the game itself, not the pieces  | 
     
   
  
  
     
    Nikolaos Kalamarês, born into a wealthy Greek 
    family in Lausanne, Switzerland in 1907, attended law school in Athens where he 
    became more interested in literature, politics, art, and cinema and wrote 
    articles for various magazines and periodicals under the pseudomyn, M. 
    Spieros. His first poetry collection was published in 1933 under the 
    pseudonym, Nikêtas Randos. When he moved to Paris in 1937 and became part of 
    the Surrealist movement, he took on the pseudonym, Nicolas Calas. With 
    Breton's encouragement he published his first book of essays, Foyers 
    d’incendie, in 1938. The next year, Calas left for New York as did many 
    of his group. In the late 1940's, he collaborated with anthropologist 
    Margaret Mead on a Columbia University project resulting in the publishing 
    of the co-authored, Primitive Heritage. He also he taught art history 
    at Fairleigh Dickinson University during the 1960's. Calas died in 1988. 
    
      
        "Art is passionate, it is 
        made out of love and hatred, of pleasure, of pain; its surprises are 
        troubling, its comic element is frenetic, its tragic element is cruel, 
        the blood drips on the scene, we live in an atmosphere of crime, 
        everywhere we go we are persecuted, as Kafka saw it in The Trial or 
        Chirico in Hebdomeros. Art frightens, triggers desire, excites sex, 
        makes our limbs shiver, unsettles the eye, drives the hysterical mad and 
        gives the madman as an example. Art is never sentimental, never moral, 
        it is against established order, against the dominant class, against any 
        conformism, against any priest of any kind and origin. The Parthenon 
        proves it: Art is a powder magazine!" 
       
     
   
 
     |