The National
Era was a weekly abolitionist newspaper published in the District of
Columbia from Jan. 7, 1847 until March 22, 1860.
It's editor was Dr. Gamaliel Bailey, Jr.
John Greenleaf Whittier served as an associate editor.
One of it's primary stated purposes was to discuss the Question of
Slavery, but it wasn't limited to such a narrow topic.
The Era was a mixture of anecdotes, poems, letters, short
stories, bulletins, notations and transcripts collected and written by
persons within the United States and foreign countries.
Uncle Tom's Cabin was exclusively serialized in the National
Era. Within it's 4 pages, 7 columns per page, the National Era
offered both original material and excerpts from larger newspapers. |
I searched the
National Era database for Paul Morphy and found the following:
(the newspaper scans were
OCR'd by the source. I copied and pasted the text "as is") |
November 19,
1857
Vol. XI No. 568 P. 185
Mr. Morphy, the champion chess player, it is said, will challenge Europe
through the New York Chess Club, to produce a man to play with him, next
spring, in New York, for from one to five thousand dollars. |
March 18, 1858
Vol. XII No. 585 P. 43
Paul Morphy, of New Orleans, the king of American chess players, has
challenged Howard Stanton, chess editor of the London Illustrated News,
who is considered the king of European chess players, to visit New
Orleans, and engage in a tilt with him for $5,000 a side. If Mr. Stanton
[sic] loses, he is to be allowed $1,000 to
pay his expenses. |
July 29, 1858
Vol. XII No. 604 P. 119FOREIGN SUMMARY.
Mr. Morphy, who arrived out by the Africa, quietly walked into the
St. George's chess club one night last week, and, after beating Mr. Lewen,
[sic] who is a recognised
[sic] champion, with the greatest ease, offered a challenge to
Mt. Staunton, the British Coeur de Leon of the noble game. Mr.
Staunton accepted the proposition, sat down, went to work, almost cleared
the board in some twenty moves, and was shout withdrawing in contempt,
when he was arrested by a “check,” which in three moves more grew into a
“mate.” You may imagine the consternation of the hero and of the
lookers-on. “May I ask your name, sir?” said Mr. S. “Certainly, sir,”
replied his young antagonist; “my name is Morphy.” “Oh! of America?” “Yes,
sir.” “Ah, then! I am sorry, but I am not quite in play just now. I should
rather not risk another game just at present.” And so Mr. Staunton
withdrew. The event has excited quite as great sensation in the world of
chess as was bred in the world of yachtsmen by the victory of the America;
and Mr. Morphy has made up a match with Andersen, the Hungarian, upon
which all England that playeth chess will, of course, be vehemently
betting in the course of a fortnight. You may regard this as a set-off,
perhaps, against the defeat of Mr. Ten Broeck's horses, though it should
be remembered that the battle, even there, is not yet given up.
- London Times.
|
September 16,
1858
Vol. XII No. 611 P. 147
FOREIGN SUMMARY
Mr. Morphy, the American chess-player, had played eight games
blindfolded, at one time, at the Birmingham Chess Congress, winning all
but one.
|
September
30, 1858
Vol. XII No. 613 P. 155FOREIGN SUMMARY.
The ship Ann had arrived from Australia, with nearly $2,000,000 value
in gold.
Mr. Morphy, the famous chess player, was beaten at Paris by M. Hanwitz.
The forcible abduction by the Roman inquisition at Bologne of Jewish
child, under the pretence that it had been baptized secretly by a nurse,
had created a painful sensation throughout the Jewish world. The Jews of
London have taken the matter up.
|
October 7, 1858
Vol. XII No. 614 P. 159
The way in which Harwitz [sic] beat Morphy at
chess, in Paris, is described as follows, in an English paper:
“Harwitz [sic] won first move, and proposed
to play the 'King's gambit,' which the Yankee accepted. Morphy sacrificed
a knight for a terrific attack, which, with an inferior antagonist, must
have succeeded. Harwitz [sic] made a firm
defence, [sic] and remained after the shock
with queen and four pawns to queen and one. By admirable manoeuvring, the
Prussian succeeded in enforcing an exchange of queens, which decided
Morphy to resign.” |
October 14, 1858
Vol. XII No. 615 P. 164PAUL MORPHY IN
EUROPE.
The great chess match between Germany and America, between M.
Harrwitz, of Prussia, and Mr. Paul Morphy, of the United States, is now
going on in Paris at the Café de la Régence, in the Rue St. Honoré, the
headquarters of the lovers of this scientific game. The match is to be won
by the gainer of the first seven games. Harrwitz gained the first two
games; Mr. Morphy gained the three next. In the third and fourth games Mr.
Morphy made some of the most brilliant and startling moves that had ever
been seen in the Cafe de la Régence, and so great was the enthusiasm that
telegraphic despatches [sic] were sent to the
Rhine, to Méry, to the Duke of Brunswick, and other great players, begging
them to come and see the wonder of the world. Notwithstanding the watering
season, when all the fashion is supposed at least to be out of town, the
Café de la Régence is the scene of a crowd, or rather a mob, of
distinguished men, and even women, of all nationalities and all tongues.
It is believed that Morphy will beat Harrwitz, though it is not by any
means sure, and, in that case, he becomes the champion of the world, for
no man in Europe can beat Harrwitz. Harrwitz is 27 years old, Morphy but
22. Morphy plays much faster than Harrwitz, and in fact, faster than
any adversary he has yet met in Europe, and the boldness and originality
of his moves strike the lookers-on with amazement and admiration.
A gentleman now in Paris writes as follows:
“The greatest of living French sculptors, Lequesne, the pupil and
successor of Pradier, has asked Morphy to sit to him for his bust in
marble. Morphy gave him the first sitting yesterday. The bust will be
exhibited at the Expo-position des Beaux Arts. This is, I think, the
highest honor Morphy has as yet received. But I can assure you they treat
him here like a god. He dines with his Royal Highness the Duke of
Brunswick on Sunday. The other night, at the Theatre Français,
half the audience stood up and looked at him - he perfectly unconscious
until it was pointed out to him. Everybody seeks introductions to him, and
the old players of the time of Labourdonnais, treat him with the greatest
reverence.”
After finishing his match with Harrwitz, Mr. Morphy will proceed directly
to Berlin and Breslau, to meet Anderssen, Lange, and Mayet, Breslau, to
meet Anderssen, Lange, and Mayet, who, with Von der Lasa, are at present
the greatest exponents of the German chess. It is a matter of much regret,
both to Mr. Morphy and his admirers, that the diplomatic duties of Von der
Lasa who in Prussian Minister at Rio Janeiro) preclude the possibility of
bringing about a meeting between these distinguished players. The last
Illustrated News of London gives a portrait and life of Mr. Morphy,
together with the eight games played blindfolded by him at the Birmingham
meeting.
|
October 21, 1858
Vol. XII No. 616 P. 167FOREIGN SUMMARY.
France. - Napoleon has returned from Branitz, and was
about to visit the Chalons camp. The fortress at Vincennes is to be
enlarged. eighty millions of francs are needed to complete
Cherbourg.
The Prince Napoleon met with a distinguished reception from the Emperor
Alexander.
A grand review took place on the 1st inst. at Paris, in presence of the
Emperor and Empress. The troops consisted of ten battalions of the
Imperial Guard, amounting to 6,000 men. Their Majesties were received with
great enthusiasm, both by the military and the people.
The Moniteur contains a decree extending to the 30th of September, next
year, the decree of September, 1857, relative to the importation of
foreign grain.
Mr. Morphy, the American chess-player, had been astonishing the Parisians
by repeating his extraordinary performance of playing eight games with
eight separate players at one and the same time, without seeing the
boards. Mr. Morphy won six of the games, and the other two were drawn. The
play lasted for ten hours, during which time Mr. Morphy never took the
slightest refreshment, and at the conclusion he did not appear to be much
fatigued.
|
November 11, 1858
Vol. XII No. 619 P. 179GENERAL SUMMARY.
Porter's Spirit says:
“We are glad to see the proposition for a reception to Paul Morphy, when
he shall return to this country from Europe, has been received with
universal favor, and the chess players of this city and Brooklyn intend to
take the thing in charge. Mr. Morphy will not probably be able to return
much before the Christmas holydays, as his meetings with Anderssen, Her
Von der Lasa, Napoleon III, and Staunton, if the latter can be crowded
into it, will consume the best portion of November and December.”
|
November 18, 1858
Vol. XII No. 620 P. 183
Miscellaneous. - The chess-players of Manchester propose to invite
Mr. Morphy to a public dinner previous to his departure for America. |
March 31, 1859
Vol. XIII No. 639 P. 51FOREIGN SUMMARY.
But chess match was progressing at Paris, Morphy playing against
Mongradin [sic], the President of the London club. Four games had been played,
Morphy winning all. The winner of the first seven games to be victor.
|
May 19, 1859
Vol. XIII No. 646 P. 79
PAUL MORPHY, THE AMERICAN CHESS KING. This gentleman, previous to leaving
New York for New Orleans, will visit Boston, where a public dinner has
been tendered him. Hon. Edward Everett, Jared Sparks, Oliver Wendell
Holmes, and other distinguished citizens of the modern Athens, will make
addresses on the occasion. Mr. Morphy, at present, is somewhat prostrated
from the effects of his voyage. The Post says:
"Mr. Morphy spent a couple of hours at the rooms of the New York Chess
Club on Wednesday evening, and played four or five games, at the odds of a
knight, with Mr. F. Perrin, one of the strongest players in this country,
and easily won all the games but one. Telegrams have been received from
all parts of the country, to know what route Mr. Morphy will take on his
way home to New Orleans, so that arrangements can be made for his proper
reception. At the urgent solicitation of his friends, Mr. Morphy has
determined to play no more blindfold games. The testimonials from his
friends here will be presented to him in about two weeks." |
June 2, 1859
Vol. XIII No. 648 P. 86
BOSTON, May 26, 1859.
To the Editor of the National Era:
Since my last, the opera has engrossed a considerable part of the
attention of pleasure considerable part of the attention of pleasure
goers, continuing on Friday eve with Lucrezia Borgin, with Mme. Gazzaniga
and Sig. Stefani, and to the manifest satisfaction of the large audience.
Stefani, as a singer, excels Sbriglia, but has not the smoothness and
flexibility of Brignoli, although his fine acting and careful attention to
his role makes him an acceptable artist on the stage. Saturday, the
opera of "Martha" was repeated at a matinee with satisfaction, Sbriglia
appearing much better than on the opening night, and rose fifty per cent.
in the opinions of his hearers. Monday night, the opinions of his hearers.
Monday night, La Favorita," of which the last act was excellent, the rest
not very brilliant. Tuesday eve, "Norma," which I did not attend, but
heard it was well spoken of. Wednesday night, "Don Giovanni," which was
well rendered. Formes, with his perfect personification and spirited
action, at times convulsing the audience with laughter, and at others
almost freezing them with terror, was enough to make it, well listened to;
but, as yet, "Lucrezia" has been the gem, and the poisoning and death
scenes the best of all- Gazzaniga, with her purity and freshness of voice,
and impassioned declamation, electrifying the audience. I cannot see as
her voice is less fresh than when I heard her two years since in
Philadelphia, where, in "Traviatta," she earned laurels. The "De Molays,"
returned from their Southern tour on Tuesday P.M., and were escorted by
two bands of music through the principal streets to their lodge. The
streets were lined with people to note their return and the knightly
bearing of the "Templars." This is "Anniversary Week," and the city is
full of strangers; and, what is almost unprecedented, they have very fine
weather for their exercise, and all is going in to the satisfaction of all
concerned, I suppose, but my limited space will prevent my giving a report
of their
proceedings in detail.
Paul Morphy comes to Boston on Saturday, to stay a week, the guest of the
Boston Chess Club; to have a public dinner, at which Dr. Holmes is
to preside- "a limited number of tickets for sale at $10 per ticket, the
purchasers being admitted to the club-rooms during his stay."
We have had three days of fine weather, and a fine prospect for
another to-morrow. Hoping for many, (for we are entitled to them to make
an average.) I remain, &c. |
June 9, 1859
Vol. XIII No. 649 P. 90THE
REVIEW.
The Exploits and Triumphs in Europe of Paul Morphy, the Chess
Champion; including an Historical Account of Clubs, Biographical Sketches
o' Famous Players, and various Information and Anecdote relating to the
Noble Game of Chess. By Paul Morphy's Late Secretary.
New York: D. Appleton & Co., 316 and 318 Broadway. 1859. For sale as
above.
With a modesty as rare as it is commendable, the author of this work sinks
his own individuality in that of the great Paul. He himself is by
implication, as the immortal Toots remarks, "of no consequence;" but as
the Secretary of the Chess Champion, the conqueror of two worlds, he rises
into comparative importance. He is content to shine by a reflected light.
When the Great Western spreads all her canvas and puts out to sea, he
quietly lets
-"His little bark attendant sail,
Pursue the triumph, and partake the gale."
But by so much as he sacrifices self, by so much does he exalt Paul.
The book is a transcript of victories. Veni, vidi, (sometimes!)
vici, may be Morphy's motto. Staunton, the English champion, concluded
discretion to be the better part of valor, and shilly-shallied himself out
of the appointed contest. Harwitz believed that
"He who fights and run away,
May live to fight another day."
and obeyed the instinct of self-preservation Anderssen suffered
himself to be annihilated with Teutonic nonchalance and Christian
resignation; and Paul Morphy and his Squire have come home, loaded with
honors from priest, and people, and peer, and princess, to receive silver
chess-boards and golden men, and live in golden houses, and eat from
golden dishes, for aught we know, through the remainder of their natural
lives. Wherefore, if any one can show just cause why Paul Morphy should
not forthwith be made President of these United States, let him now speak,
or else hereafter forever hold his peace.
|
August 18, 1859
Vol. XIII No. 659 P. 130
THE WEALTHY PEOPLE OF NEW ORLEANS. - The New Orleans Delta publishes a
list of all the tax payers of that city, who pay over $500 tax to the
corporation. The rate of taxation is 1 1/2 per cent. We subjoin a few of
the largest individual payers: Madame de Pontelba, $8,199; Paul Tulane,
$3136; H. M. Shiff, $4,792; Jacob L. Florence, $4,710; W. N. Mercer,
$4,630; H. S. Buckner, $3,970; W. H. Montgomery, $3,900; John Haskins,
$3,645; John Slidell, $3,399; Mrs. A. Morphy, $1,402; Mrs. J. B.
Eustis, $1,052; D. B. Morphy, $531. |
February 23,
1860
Vol. XIV No. 686 P. 31NEW
BOOKS.
The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the
Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. By Charles
Darwin, M.A.
New York; D. Appleton & Co. 1860.
This is but an abstract of a larger work on that much-vexed question, “The
Origin of Species,” in course of preparation by Mr. Darwin. His theory is,
that “we need not go in search of any other causes than those which are at
present in action for an explanation of the phenomena exhibited to us in
the present distribution and past succession of life upon the globe; a
principle of change being still at work, the continuous operation of
which, through the countless ages of geological time, is sufficient to
account for the production, from a small number of original types, of a
vast multiplicity of diversified forms, succeeding one another by natural
descent, and undergoing progressive changes, in accordance with the
alterations progressively taking place in the external conditions of their
existence.”
Morphy's Games. A Selections of the best Games played by the distinguished
Champion in England and America. With analytical and critical notes, by
J. Lowenthal. New York; D. Appleton & Co. For sale by Taylor & Maury,
Washington, D.C.
This volume will meet with a warm welcome, from all chess amateurs. It is
interesting as a record of the exploits of Morphy among the chess Paladins
of the Old World, and, besides, will richly repay a study of the brilliant
and intricate games which are scattered through its pages. The notes of M.
Lowenthal, himself a celebrated player, and no mean antagonist of Morphy,
are judicious and well timed, and will be found of great assistance to one
attempting an analysis of the games.
|
September 29,
1859
Vol. XIII No. 665 P. 153
CHESS.
by James M'Cune Smith
In that sad autumn month of 1857, when the commercial panic had reached
its height, and when New York city seemed the central vortex of disaster
not only of the United States, but of the civilized world there were two
occurrences in singular contrast with the frightfully excited state of the
public mind. To the few who had the heart to look out of doors, out of
doors never looked more lovely. The air was balmy and of delightful
temperature, the sky was cloudless, the sunsets beautiful, and never,
since the world began, threw a more gorgeous hue over mountain and forest
of the American landscape. We confess to some sympathy with that gloomy
state of the public mind not that we had any golden argosy in stocks or
shares which went down yet there was the coming winter, and, possibly, wan
cheeks and supperless beds to those dearer than life. But, whatever gloom
we felt was one day suddenly dissipated by the glorious “out of doors,”
which had smiled and beckoned us many a day unheeded, and which, now no
longer to be kept aloof, told us of the goodness as well as the glory of
the Almighty.
We thought then, and we think now, that had the men of God, instead of
improving that dark hour with pictures of darker sins and darker
vengeance, and a more fearful judgment to come, had they simply pointed to
the earth yielding her abundance, and to the air charged with health, and
to the sky filled with the smile of God, and said to their alarmed people,
“Peace, be still!” there would soon have been an end of all panic.
Cheerfulness would have resumed her sway; and many a grave would have yet
remained unfilled, and the sadder gates of our institutions for the insane
would now hold some thousands fewer within their portals.
The other occurrence was in-doors. While men in Wall street surged to and
fro under impulses they no more understood and could no more govern than
the iron waves in the howling storm; while men in Broadway and other
streets adjacentthe masters suddenly arrested in their golden dreams of
enormous profit, and the workmen sadly folding up their implements of
labor; and while the poor, frantic with an unknown dread, rushed to the
savings banks,* or gathered in bread mobs in distant parksin the midst of
this social hurricane, there was one house in Broadway, in which men daily
gathered, and matters went on“Calm as a summer's
sea,”
the very centre of the vortex, yet calm as a moonlit pool, so deeply
embayed in mountains, that no breath of air could reach it a land-locked
haven, in which whoever entered, however storm riven or care-crushed,
became calm and still, and hung up his votive offerings to the genius
loci; which was neither music, nor dancing, nor dice, nor wine, nor opium,
nor lotus, nor hasheesh, but simply Chess! the immortal game, painted as
played on the inside of the tomb of Nevotp, the Egyptian, 3,000 years
B.C.;** but who can paint it as played at Donadi's rooms in
Broadway, in the year of grace 1857?
We have said that “out of doors” dissipated our gloom at that date; but
in-doors this indoors was an accessory cloud-dispeller. We “got” there
after this wise:
Years ago, in the early months of our still persistent honeymoon, I
purchased a pretty but fragile set of chessmen, and aided by an old copy
of "Walker", and the new frau, made some little progress in chess, until
little fingers grew up round the table, and made a general smash of
knights, pawns, and rooks, and little cares of another kind interfered
with further proficiency. And it is good testimony in favor of the game,
that when knight and pawn so went to the band, no harsh nor unkind word
was uttered against their young destroyers, the chubby fingers were not
rapped, nor their owners punished. It is not always so, however. We read
of a passionate duke, in the middle ages, breaking the chess board on the
skull of his conqueror; and I have seen the wild Fylbel aim a sudden blow
at a little French, man, who recklessly swept the men off the board when
Fyl was about to “mate” an opponent. My description of the game attracted
some friends to buy board and book; and in a little while, Fylbel, the
Downings, one of the Reasons, and an occasional jew-pedlar who insisted on
taking the king, (the atrocious regicide!) with the preliminary
exclamation, “chess de koenig” formed as clumsy a set of chess players as
could be hunted up. The appearance of Staunton's Chess-Players Hand Book
was an era in our progress, although months were wasted in discussing the
laws of the game by that born Causidicus, who now presides over the
Sea-Girt House at Newport. In course of time, we became decent players.
So the year 1857 found us. It was some relief, looking at the daily
papers, to turn from the failure of A, B, & Co., for $150,000, and from
the suspension of specie payments by the banks, except the glorious old
Chemical, to the unruffled proceedings of the first American Chess
Congress, then in session, admission for the week, to lookers on one
dollar. But that dollar? Was it prudent, with bank account at low water,
and slim prospect of a flow, and on the edge of a long winter, with others
dependent, was it prudent so to bestow to throw away a dollar? After
hearing counsel before ourself three whole days, we held a family council
with “die frau,” who at once decided that we must go. And “went” we did.
And the officers of the Chess Congress, with nobler instincts of gentlemen
than the New York Academy of Medicine ***, did not hesitate or
refuse to admit a negro, even with the high-bloods from the South in their
midst, and the danger of the dissolution of the Union before their eyes.
Having seen their portraits in Frank Leslie, we instantly singled out
Paulsen and his great antagonist, and a little skillful elbowing found us
seated beside their board. There was Louis Paulsen, with his vast head,
sanguine temperament, but coarse fibre, indicating his rough, almost pure-Bersekir
blood; and as we gazed at Morphy, with his fine, open countenance,
brunette hue, marvelous delicacy of fibre, bright, clear eyes, and
elongated submaxillary bone, a keen suspicion entered our ethnological
department that we were not the only Carthaginian in the room. It might
only be one drop, perhaps two ,God only knows how they got there but
surely, beside the Tria mulattin who at present writes, there was also a
Hekata-mulattin in that room!
It was the old combat between Coeur de Lion and the Saladin. How
strange that the Orient and the Occident should yet war! Paulsen huge,
massive, ponderous; Morphy slight, elegant, yet swift as lightning.
The game was about half through, so far as the number of moves were
concerned. Paulsen hesitated, clasped his hands, leaving out the two long
fore-fingers, which he laid firmly on the edge of the board counted over
the five or six possible moves of his opponent, and then evidently knew
something more would follow but what? You could almost see him think; at
length, with a peculiar flourish of his arm, he
seizes a pawn, and moves. With scarcely a moment's hesitation, with his
eyes for an instant bent on the board, Morphy raises his arm as if to
strike, and throws a piece right in the way of his antagonist. Another
long, long pause, the hands again clasped: “why, take the piece, man,” is
on everybody's unopened lips; yet Paulsen pauses, again clasps his hands,
and for nearly half an hour pores over the board; he
does not take the proffered piece, but offers one of equal value; then
something skin to electricity flashed through and out of Morphy, the calm
white forehead “pleated up,” his arm raised, he swiftly moves; and, as if
caught with the same impulse. Paulsen moves instantly; then, for a few
seconds, there is a click, click, clicka move each second percussion-caps,
rifles, cannons, grape, canister, the clash of swords and then all is
still. Flushed with the struggle, Paulsen looks up to see why the other
sits calm and cold as an icicle; Paulsen glances again at the board, and
sees mate for himself three or four moves off!
Surely, thought we, chess is a question of magnetism; given, a fair
parity in skill between two players, and the more powerfully magnetic will
sway and conquer the will of the less magnetic, and force him into moves
according to his will. We had tried this often, directly, with the
susceptible engraver, P. H. R., and once, in a reflex manner, with J. S.,
of Providence. In this latter instance, he being the less practiced
player, but of impressible nerves, by fixing our attention on the board at
the same moment with him, and marking out the best move against us, he
invariably made that move, and won; per contra, while, in another game, we
made moves, and then looked away; ignored the board until he had moved;
unmagnetized, the termination of the game was speedily against him.
How, then, did Paulsen, with his superior magnetism, and not very
inferior skill, fail to affect Morphy? The moment that Morphy completed a
move, he threw the whole board away from his attention, brushed away
magnetism, so to speak often went off to the other end of the room, and
had to be summoned thence to reply to Paulsen's move. (4.) And it was very
evident that the study of the former was not at all in relation to what
Paulsen would move, but in regard to the possible moves and combinations,
embracing from twelve to twenty moves, and their twelve times twelve, and
twenty times twenty of possible inter-combinations. This whirl of
permutation, with accurate results in each of thousands of combinations,
evidently passes through Morphy's mind in like manner as in Zerah Colburn
and other arithmetical prodigies, addition, subtraction, multiplication,
and the square root, are performed with the rapidity and accuracy of Mr.
Babbage's machine. So that for any one less gifted in this peculiar power
than Morphy to attempt to play with him, is like one man at the brake of a
fire-engine, striving to play the same against another worked by steam;
or, more accurately, for an ordinary adept to endeavor to count interest
with Zerah Colburn, or the negro prodigy recently announced in Alabama.
This leads us to inquire, what is chess? Is it a purely intellectual
exercise, affording scope and improvement and test of the mental
faculties? or is it a physico-intellectual exercise, engaging muscular as
well as brain work? What faculties does it call into exercise? The eye and
fingers, the muscles of the arm, and the muscles of the orbit, the
peculiar power of seeing the men in their places, and of seeing
men that are in their places as if they were not there, but elsewhere, and
others, or blanks, where they actually are a sort of physical reticence
and imagination acting at one and the same moment such is one phase of
chess exercise. Napoleon planned his battles on large maps, with pin-heads
indicating the whereabouts of each corps, division, and even brigade. He
moved the pins about as his thought
required, and thus completed his plan. But your chess-player must go
through this preliminary fight without touching map or pin; he must with
most difficult reticence keep hands off until he makes a complete survey
of the men and the field; and when he once touches a man, it must be moved
beyond recall. This requires a stretch of attention very exhausting, nay,
almost impossible to some minds; it is the faculty which phrenologists
term “continuity,” which is the result, for the most part, of training,
sometimes a gift. We notice, in nearly all the chess - playing friends we
have named, that their failure in play depends on the lack of this
faculty. G. T. D., for example, makes the most vigorous attacks of any of
them, but, after the twelfth or sixteenth move, his attention is
exhausted, and some careless move makes him an easy prey to a less
vigorous opponent. In his case, this failure in attention, or continuity,
is confined to his chess play; in business, or in public movements, in
which he is deeply interested, he is constant, persistent, and steadfast
as a sleuth bound. This would seem to indicate that his perceptive
faculties are deficient, or are easily wearied over the chess-board. Per
contra, among these friends, P. H. R., the engraver, is the only one who
plays an even, unflagging game throughout; indeed, as many have found to
their chagrin, plays the better end game, the worse his chances appear to
be. His perceptive faculties are trained by his employment, and rather
improve than weary by continuity of exercise.
Another amateur, W. C. I., is a most interesting study at the
chess-board. He has fine perceptive faculties, is a splendid boxer, of
quick, strong, combative temperament, and of full physical imagination. He
makes the most beautiful combinations we ever saw on the chess - board;
they seem as brilliant as fireworks; but he loses almost every game, not
from breaking down of his continuity or attention, so much as from an
incurably mercurial disposition, which leads him to forsake a sound move
for one apparently more brilliant, but less safe. This
gentleman bought a mare the other day, which, in twenty four hours, kicked
three wagons to pieces, and threw him out each time; of course, instead of
getting rid of her, he is “bound” to break her, it will be “such a
splendid feat.” From the nature of the faculties which it calls into play,
we regard chess as a physical as well as intellectual exercise, requiring
muscular work as well as brain work. Cricket, billiards, chess, rise from
the physico-intellectual to the intellectuo-physical; and chess,
billiards, cricket, reverse the order. Lookers-on at cricket feel the
blood rush, the muscles clench, and a “hurra” escaping from the lips.
Lookers on at billiards tell me that to see Phelan play affords the
highest possible physical enjoyment (5.). Lookers on at chess feel
their muscles twitching, their fingers clasping and moving imaginary men,
and their heads aching when the game is done. Another reason why we regard
chess less as an intellectual than a physical exercise consists in the
fact, that the highest eminence in chess is attained before the age of
full intellectual development. In our American Chess Congress, the
champions of the champions were very young men: Morphy twenty, and Paulsen
twenty-three or four. McDonnell, Staunton, Harrwitz, Stanley, all won
their laurels in their early
days. The best chess-players on record, in like manner, had attained their
eminence while under thirty years of age; while the human intellect is not
at its full development until between the thirty-fifth and forty-fifth
year of the individual. And if chess-playing maximum occurs before the
intellectual maximum, it follows that chess is not a purely intellectual
exercise. Furthermore, a man's force in chess, like his physical power or
force, diminishes after he is thirty years of age. Yankee Sullivan at
forty three, some eighteen years after he had passed his physical maximum,
was no match for his own equal, aged twenty-five; hence the years told in
Tom Hyer's favor.
In like manner, Mr. Stanley, who, at twenty-two, had won a match
against Mr. St. Amant, in New Orleans, was but a third-rate player at
forty years of age; and the real excuse for Mr. Staunton, in declining to
play with Morphy, was, that he had passed his maximum chess-playing age
some twenty
years ago, and could not be expected, an old man, to acquit himself as if
he had been a young one. “I will take to my work, let the young gentleman
take to his play,” was really a truthful and adequate reason for declining
to play; but “why not say this before?” say the critics. Because, on
practicing, as he doubtless did, in private, Mr. Staunton discovered that
his chess skill was dulled to his own apprehension, his chess muscles had
lost their wonted fire and lubricity in the gambit. Au reste what a stupid
piece of red republicanism it is, in the midst of
the nineteenth century, to expect a king, even of chess, to throw away his
crown wittingly, before an unknown cavalier, however preux!
In relation to the higher faculties which it calls into exercise,
chess affects less the pure reasoning powers than is usually taken for
granted. Classed as a division of mathematical study, it belongs to the
arithmetical rather than the transcendental department of mathematics; it
is no higher than permutation. All possible moves of a given number of
pieces can be summed up in an intelligible line of figures less than a
yard long. The objection, therefore, of the great Scotch metaphysician to
mathematics, as a means of mental development that they lead to only
positive results, as in a grooved track applies with double force to
chess, which calls into exercise one of the lower branches of mathematics
only.
A great deal has been said about invention in relation to
chess-playing, and a London newspaper especially lands the inventive
genius of Mr. Morphy. If our view of his peculiar power be the correct
one, then there is no invention in his play. All the possible combinations
of the moves before him appear to his mind as clearly as K. p. to K.'
to an ordinary player; and from what he sees, he selects the best play. It
is about as much invention as is exercised by a natural arithmetician, in
announcing, in a minute, a difficult result in interest for days no more.
Besides, this gentlemant, he very best of known living chess-players seems
singularly deficient in even the moderate degree of invention which can be
predicated of chess. We have the Evans Gambit, the Scotch Gambit, the
Muzio Gambit, &c., &c., but we have not yet the Morphy Gambit, nor is
there in print more than one very
commonplace problem by our modern chess king.
But the problems! Do not they require invention! If they do, it is
invention of no higher character, and requiring no greater powers, than to
construct certain figures with a Chinese puzzle; and a first-rate
problem-composer is seldom, if ever, a first-class player. These views of
the status of chess-playing receive confirmation from the fact that
first-class chess-players have seldom, if ever, distinguished themselves
in the higher departments of thought or invention. Mr. Buckle, the author
of “Civilization in England,” may be adduced as an exception; he was,
fifteen years ago, among the most eminent chess-players in Europe; he
suddenly gave up chess-playing, betook himself to study, and his admirable
volume is the first fruits of fifteen years of intense application. Yet,
while, he betrays an
extent of reading wider than that so pompously announced by Gibbon, and
while strong common sense and keen observation are abundantly manifest in
his work, there is lacking the bold grasp and deep insight which we find
in Hume and Sir James Mackintosh, and even in Dumas. Mr. Buckle lets us
into the secret of his shortcomings, moreover, in the following sentence:
“Whoever will take the pains
fairly to estimate the present condition of mental philosophy must admit
that, notwithstanding the influence it has always exercised over some of
the most powerful minds, and through them over society at large, there is,
nevertheless, no other study which has been so zealously prosecuted, so
long continued, and yet remains so barren of results!” Barren of results!
Shades of Locke, Malebranche, Berkeley, Dugald Stewart, Reid, Brown,
Cousin, and Sir William Hamilton! Of course, Mr. Buckle is an ardent
admirer of Auguste Compte, and fifteen
years of purely literary labor has not raised him above the intellectual
level of the chess-board.
Yet chess-playing is an amusement worthy of cultivation, especially
for the young. It is better in-door entertainment than cards, or dice, or
lager-bier; it has been well said that it does not lead to gambling. It
has the positive merit of improving the tone of manners and of cultivating
the power of attention. In looking at Morphy and Paulsen, in 1857, we were
struck with the evident purity of both these young men. Neither presented
the bleared eyes, shaking hands, nor nervous tremor, which a four-hours
sitting would betray in nine-tenths of our young men of the city; they
were plainly in perfect physical condition, and all their faculties were
clear and in full honest exercise. And so must the devotees of chess keep
themselves, or they will inevitably lose rank as chess-players.
* It was a marked instance of “faith,” that while the
colored people of New York had over a million of dollars in savings banks,
scarce one of them was seen in the crowd who made this “run” on those
institutions.
** Bunsen, Egypt's Place in Universal History,
vol. ii, p. 288.
*** A month or two after the organization of
the New York Academy of Medicine, the writer of this, at the request of
the late Dr. Bliss, and Dr. Tones, sent his name, with these gentlemen as
vouchers, as an applicant for membership. It was duly referred to the
proper committee, who sent their chairman, the venerable Dr. Francis, with
a letter, acknowledging the fullness of the credentials, and even passing
as encomium on the applicant, yet respectfully requesting him to withhold
his application for the present, lest it might interfere with the
“harmony” of the young institution. This be did on conditions which the
committee and the Academy took the earliest opportunity flagrantly to
violate.
(4*) Morphy, on meeting a new antagonist of first
class, generally loses the first game. He then sits by the board, and is
under the magnetism of his opponent. Ten minutes reflection, after the
game is over, shows him his own false play, and the strength of his
adversary; in after games he deserts the board and play as soon as he has
moved and wins.
(5*) Probably that sense of pleasure from muscular
movement announced by Brown, in his Lectures on the Philosophy of the
Human Mind; pages 134-186. Glasg. 1830. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives by Title
links
personal
Sarah's Serendipitous Chess Page
The Life and Chess of Paul Morphy
Sarah's Chess History Forum
chess - general
Chesslinks Worldwide
chess - history
Mark Week's History on the Web
Chess Journalists of America
Chess History Newsgroup
Hebrew Chess
Chess Tourn. & Match History
Super Tournaments of the Past
La grande storia degli scacchi
Bobby Fischer
Bill Wall's Chess Pages
|