|
Event table notes
|
| Event data |
| Place: London, England |
| Start date: 14 Aug. 1891 |
| End date: 20 Aug. 1891 |
| |
| Notes: |
| Kingston's review of Di Felice's book questions this match result (+1-0=1 for Lasker) saying that Whyld does not mention it and that Hannak gives +1=5. However, my copy of Hannak at least does give +1-0=1 (p.29) as does Feenstra Kuiper and Lasker's Manual of Chess (and Giffen's web page). Gillam, in the book by Forster et al., explain that the second game was not actually finished when Lee resigned the match for health reasons, but that Lasker was up a pawn at that point, so it was counted by Hannak as a win for Lasker. |
|
| |
| References |
| Books |
| Di Felice, Chess Results, 1747-1900, page 131 |
| Feenstra Kuiper, 100 Jahre Schachzweikämpfe, page 25 |
| Forster, Negele and Tischbierek, Emanuel Lasker, Vol.I, page 107 |
| Hannak, Emanuel Lasker, page 29 |
| Lasker, Lasker's Manual of Chess, page xx |
| de Lint, 10-Jahrig Bestaan van den N.I.S.B., page 100 |
| Web |
| Alberti, Marco A. [Emanuel Lasker] |
| Giffen, Glen. [Lasker, Emanuel] |
| Kingston, Taylor. [Don't Bet the Farm or Scholar's Concern Tempers Stat-Freak's Delight], page 12 |
| |
