| Results |
| |
|
Match scores
|
| Name |
Edo |
Dev. |
Score |
/ |
Games |
| Schott, George |
2080 | (67) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Cockin, Samuel |
1854 | (75) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Knapton, Charles |
2067 | (81) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Woollard, Joseph |
2002 | (70) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Guest, Antony |
2392 | (52) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Hussey, Edward |
1898 | (58) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Stokoe, Thomas |
2104 | (60) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Wright, Frederick |
2050 | (78) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Schott, George |
2080 | (67) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Knapton, Charles |
2067 | (81) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Guest, Antony |
2392 | (52) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| Stokoe, Thomas |
2104 | (60) |
0.5 | / | 1 |
| |
|
Event table notes
|
| Event data |
| Name: Bradford Meeting - Section II (Class A) |
| Place: Bradford |
| Start date: 22 Nov. 1884 |
| End date: 22 Nov. 1884 |
| |
| Notes: |
| The report in the Leeds Mercury (29 Nov. 1884, p.7) only indicates who beat who, without giving scores. However, this was a one-day event and so almost certainly consisted of a single game per pairing, so I assume 1-0 in each case, except for the game specified as a draw. The draw was not replayed and no final was held. Schott was given half the prize money, the other half was split between Guest and Stokoe. |
|
| |
| References |
|
| |
