Results |
|
Match scores
|
Name |
Edo |
Dev. |
Score |
/ |
Games |
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
2 | / | 3 |
Henderson, R.C. |
2031 | (103) |
1 | / | 3 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of a knight |
|
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
1 | / | 1 |
Lulman, A. |
1848 | (76) |
0 | / | 1 |
|
A'Beckett, E.F. |
1797 | (81) |
1 | / | 1 |
Chamier, G. |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
|
Stephen, William |
2001 | (74) |
0 | / | 1 |
Trowell, T.J. |
1761 | (81) |
1 | / | 1 |
Stephen, William gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Runting, W.J. |
1719 | (80) |
1 | / | 1 |
Jackman (1) |
1354 | (140) |
0 | / | 1 |
Runting, W.J. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Myers, M. |
1507 | (120) |
1 | / | 1 |
A'Beckett, R. |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
|
Hammond, R.K. |
1920 | (74) |
1 | / | 1 |
Goldsmith, B. |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
Hammond, R.K. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Stephen, William |
2001 | (74) |
0 | / | 1 |
Henderson, R.C. |
2031 | (103) |
1 | / | 1 |
Stephen, William gave odds of pawn and two moves |
|
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
1 | / | 1 |
Trowell, T.J. |
1761 | (81) |
0 | / | 1 |
|
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
1 | / | 1 |
A'Beckett, R. |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of a knight |
|
Myers, M. |
1507 | (120) |
1 | / | 1 |
Jackman (1) |
1354 | (140) |
0 | / | 1 |
|
Hammond, R.K. |
1920 | (74) |
1 | / | 1 |
Runting, W.J. |
1719 | (80) |
0 | / | 1 |
|
A'Beckett, E.F. |
1797 | (81) |
1 | / | 1 |
Goldsmith, B. |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
A'Beckett, E.F. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Lulman, A. |
1848 | (76) |
1 | / | 1 |
Chamier, G. |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
|
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
1 | / | 3 |
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
2 | / | 3 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of pawn and two moves |
|
A'Beckett, E.F. |
1797 | (81) |
0 | / | 1 |
Henderson, R.C. |
2031 | (103) |
1 | / | 1 |
A'Beckett, E.F. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
1 | / | 1 |
A'Beckett, R. |
| |
0 | / | 1 |
Chamier, Anthony gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
1 | / | 1 |
Hammond, R.K. |
1920 | (74) |
0 | / | 1 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of pawn and two moves |
|
Stephen, William |
2001 | (74) |
1 | / | 1 |
Runting, W.J. |
1719 | (80) |
0 | / | 1 |
Stephen, William gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Lulman, A. |
1848 | (76) |
1 | / | 1 |
Myers, M. |
1507 | (120) |
0 | / | 1 |
Lulman, A. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
0 | / | 1 |
Henderson, R.C. |
2031 | (103) |
1 | / | 1 |
Chamier, Anthony gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
3 | / | 5 |
Trowell, T.J. |
1761 | (81) |
2 | / | 5 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of pawn and two moves |
|
Stephen, William |
2001 | (74) |
1 | / | 1 |
Hammond, R.K. |
1920 | (74) |
0 | / | 1 |
Stephen, William gave odds of pawn and move |
|
A'Beckett, E.F. |
1797 | (81) |
1 | / | 1 |
Myers, M. |
1507 | (120) |
0 | / | 1 |
A'Beckett, E.F. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Lulman, A. |
1848 | (76) |
0 | / | 1 |
Henderson, R.C. |
2031 | (103) |
1 | / | 1 |
Lulman, A. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Stephen, William |
2001 | (74) |
0 | / | 1 |
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
1 | / | 1 |
Stephen, William gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
1 | / | 1 |
A'Beckett, E.F. |
1797 | (81) |
0 | / | 1 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of pawn and two moves |
|
Hammond, R.K. |
1920 | (74) |
2 | / | 3 |
Trowell, T.J. |
1761 | (81) |
1 | / | 3 |
|
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
1.5 | / | 4 |
Hammond, R.K. |
1920 | (74) |
2.5 | / | 4 |
|
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
2 | / | 2 |
Lulman, A. |
1848 | (76) |
0 | / | 2 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of pawn and two moves |
|
Hammond, R.K. |
1920 | (74) |
0 | / | 2 |
Henderson, R.C. |
2031 | (103) |
2 | / | 2 |
Hammond, R.K. gave odds of pawn and move |
|
Goldsmith, Louis |
2321 | (71) |
1 | / | 3 |
Chamier, Anthony |
2094 | (75) |
2 | / | 3 |
Goldsmith, Louis gave odds of pawn and two moves |
|
|
Event table notes
|
Event data |
Name: Melbourne Club Handicap |
Place: Melbourne |
Start date: 21 May 1872 |
End date: Oct. 1872 |
|
Notes: |
This was a 14-player knockout, in which players were knocked out only after losing three matches. Each match between pairs of players was for the first to win two games. In most cases, I know only who beat who, not the score of the pairing, and these I record as 1-0 for the winner. In cases where I know that the match was won 2-0 or 2-1, that is indicated, though I don't always know how many draws there were if any. In the 3rd round, I can only include the match A.F. Chamier - L. Goldsmith, because although I know who won and who lost in that round, I don't know the pairings aside from this one. In the fourth round, the result +1-0=0 for Stephen-Runting is exact, because Runting withdrew after losing one game. |
|
|
References |
Periodicals |
[ATCJ], vol. 6, no. 137, 17 Aug. 1872, page 213 |
[Aus], vol. 12, no. 321, 25 May 1872, page 653 |
[Aus], vol. 12, no. 322, 1 June 1872, page 685 |
[Aus], vol. 12, no. 324, 15 June 1872, page 749 |
[Aus], vol. 12, no. 325, 22 June 1872, page 781 |
[Aus], vol. 12, no. 326, 29 June 1872, page 813 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 327, 6 July 1872, page 13 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 328, 13 July 1872, page 45 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 330, 27 July 1872, page 109 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 331, 3 Aug. 1872, page 141 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 333, 17 Aug. 1872, page 205 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 335, 31 Aug. 1872, page 269 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 337, 14 Sep. 1872, page 333 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 340, 5 Oct. 1872, page 428 |
[Aus], vol. 13, no. 341, 12 Oct. 1872, page 461 |
| |