London 1871 (3)




Results
 
Match scores
Name   Edo    Dev.   Score  /  Games 
de Vere, Cecil    2565 (42) 2 /
Fenton, Richard    2303 (62) 1 /
  de Vere, Cecil gave odds of pawn and move
 
Burn, Amos    2451 (47) 2 /
Bartrum    0 /
  Burn, Amos gave odds of a knight
 
Watts, John    2067 (77) 2 /
Parley    1598 (144) 1 /
  Watts, John gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Harper, T.    2254 (88) 1.5 /
Cole, Alfred    2231 (83) 0.5 /
 
Frankenstein, Edward    2193 (83) 1 /
Rudderforth    2073 (96) 0 /
  Frankenstein, Edward gave odds of pawn and move
 
Swyer, J.    1889 (115) 2 /
Gamman, E.    1990 (102) 0 /
  Gamman, E. gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
de Vere, Cecil    2565 (42) 2 /
Burn, Amos    2451 (47) 0 /
 
Harper, T.    2254 (88) 1 /
Frankenstein, Edward    2193 (83) 0 /
 
Clarke, J. (1)    1892 (115) 1 /
Swyer, J.    1889 (115) 0 /
 
de Vere, Cecil    2565 (42) 2 /
Watts, John    2067 (77) 1 /
  de Vere, Cecil gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Harper, T.    2254 (88) 1.5 /
Clarke, J. (1)    1892 (115) 0.5 /
  Harper, T. gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
de Vere, Cecil    2565 (42) 2 /
Harper, T.    2254 (88) 1 /
  de Vere, Cecil gave odds of pawn and move
 

Event table notes

Event data
Name: City of London Club Handicap - Section 3
Place: London
Start date: 22 Nov. 1870
End date: 9 June 1871
 
Notes:
For some pairings we know only who won, not what the score of the mini-match was. In such cases, I have listed the result as +1-0 for the winner. This will introduce a small bias, if the score was really +2-1 or +1-0=1, for example. Like the other two sections, this one had 16 players. But the mini-match between J. Clarke and W.T. Chappell was won by Clarke by default. No games appear to have been played. Also, Forster has only a question mark for Beadall's class, so I cannot include his win over H.F. Down or his loss to J.J. Watts.
 
References
Books
   Forster, Amos Burn, page 32
Periodicals
   [WP], vol. 3, 1 Dec. 1870, page 124

Tournament information updated: 16 May 2018