| Results |
| |
|
Match scores
|
| Name |
Edo |
Dev. |
Score |
/ |
Games |
| de Vere, Cecil |
2553 | (41) |
2 | / | 3 |
| Fenton, Richard |
2295 | (58) |
1 | / | 3 |
| de Vere, Cecil gave odds of pawn and move |
| |
| Burn, Amos |
2453 | (47) |
2 | / | 2 |
| Bartrum |
| |
0 | / | 2 |
| Burn, Amos gave odds of a knight |
| |
| Watts, John |
2042 | (75) |
2 | / | 3 |
| Parley |
1609 | (141) |
1 | / | 3 |
| Watts, John gave odds of pawn and two moves |
| |
| Harper, T. |
2240 | (87) |
1.5 | / | 2 |
| Cole, Alfred |
2217 | (83) |
0.5 | / | 2 |
| |
| Frankenstein, Edward |
2198 | (81) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Rudderforth, W.H. |
2002 | (88) |
0 | / | 1 |
| Frankenstein, Edward gave odds of pawn and move |
| |
| Swyer, J. |
1880 | (114) |
2 | / | 2 |
| Gamman, E. |
1992 | (102) |
0 | / | 2 |
| Gamman, E. gave odds of pawn and two moves |
| |
| de Vere, Cecil |
2553 | (41) |
2 | / | 2 |
| Burn, Amos |
2453 | (47) |
0 | / | 2 |
| |
| Harper, T. |
2240 | (87) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Frankenstein, Edward |
2198 | (81) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Clarke, John |
1893 | (114) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Swyer, J. |
1880 | (114) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| de Vere, Cecil |
2553 | (41) |
2 | / | 3 |
| Watts, John |
2042 | (75) |
1 | / | 3 |
| de Vere, Cecil gave odds of pawn and two moves |
| |
| Harper, T. |
2240 | (87) |
1.5 | / | 2 |
| Clarke, John |
1893 | (114) |
0.5 | / | 2 |
| Harper, T. gave odds of pawn and two moves |
| |
| de Vere, Cecil |
2553 | (41) |
2 | / | 3 |
| Harper, T. |
2240 | (87) |
1 | / | 3 |
| de Vere, Cecil gave odds of pawn and move |
| |
|
Event table notes
|
| Event data |
| Name: City of London Club Handicap - Section 3 |
| Place: London, England |
| Start date: 22 Nov. 1870 |
| End date: 9 June 1871 |
| |
| Notes: |
| For some pairings we know only who won, not what the score of the mini-match was. In such cases, I have listed the result as +1-0 for the winner. This will introduce a small bias, if the score was really +2-1 or +1-0=1, for example. Like the other two sections, this one had 16 players. But the mini-match between J. Clarke and W.T. Chappell was won by Clarke by default. No games appear to have been played. Also, Forster has only a question mark for Beadall's class, so I cannot include his win over H.F. Down or his loss to J.J. Watts. The Era of 2 Apr. 1871 (p.4) has a game between Cole and Harper from this event, stated to be won by Cole. However, Forster has a score of +1-0=1 for Harper over Cole here, and it is certainly Harper who went on to the next round. |
|
| |
| References |
| Books |
| Forster, Amos Burn, page 32 |
| Periodicals |
| [Era], vol. 33, no. 1691, 19 Feb. 1871, page 2 |
| [Era], vol. 33, no. 1710, 2 July 1871, page 7 |
| [SoT], 31 Dec. 1870 |
| [WP], vol. 3, no. 32, 1 Dec. 1870, page 124 |
| [WP], vol. 3, no. 33, 1 Jan. 1871, page 139 |
| [WP], vol. 3, no. 34, 1 Feb. 1871, page 158 |
| [WP], vol. 3, no. 35, 1 Mar. 1871, page 172 |
| |
