Baden-Baden 1870




Results
 
Crosstable scores
Name   Edo    Dev.   Score  /  Games   
Anderssen, Adolf    2687 (44) 11 / 16 
Steinitz, Wilhelm    2729 (44) 12.5 / 18 
Neumann, Gustav    2681 (49) 10 / 16 
Blackburne, Joseph    2579 (40) 10 / 16 
Paulsen, Louis    2608 (46) 6.5 / 15 
de Vere, Cecil    2553 (42) 4.5 / 14 
Winawer, Szymon    2566 (52) 6.5 / 16 
Rosenthal, Samuel    2544 (44) 5 / 12 
Minckwitz, Johannes    2475 (47) 5 / 15 
Stern, Adolf    2266 (85) 0 /
 
 

Event table notes

Event data
Name: Baden-Baden Tournament
Place: Baden-Baden
Start date: 18 July 1870
End date: 4 Aug. 1870
 
Notes:
Gaige, Di Felice, Feenstra Kuiper and La Grande Storia degli Scacchi are all in agreement with regard to the results, though Gaige does not include Stern, only indicating that some sources score all of his games to his opponents. Feenstra Kuiper and Di Felice indicate that Stern withdrew after playing 2 opponents, and that his scores were struck out, despite his having drawn one against Steinitz and won one against von Minckwitz. The Illustrated London News (Aug. 6) indicates that Stern lost both games against von Minckwitz and then after two rounds had a score of +0-4=0. The Westminster Papers (1 Aug. 1870, vol.3, p.49) also says Stern lost both against Minckwitz, and on p.58 shows a score of +0-4=0 for Stern. Feenstra Kuiper and Di Felice show a win and a loss for Stern against Minckwitz. I will accept the contemporary reports. Tim Harding tells me (from the Deutsche Schachzeitung, Dec. 1870, pp.313-314) that the game recorded as a draw between Stern and Steinitz was actually lost by Stern on time. Then they played the game out and Stern obtained a draw, but Steinitz cannot be considered to have been playing seriously at that point, so I will record it as a loss for Stern. The Illustrated London News of 27 Aug. 1870 (p.227) and the Era of 28 Aug. 1870 (p.7) give the complete crosstable with the 5 defaulted games scored as if played, and gives Stern 0 across the board. These two sources also have an inconsistency in giving the 2nd Anderssen-Winawer game as a win for Winawer in one place and a draw in the other. Other sources give it as a win for Winawer. Harding also says that in one of the Paulsen-de Vere games, Paulsen overstepped the time limit, but de Vere refused to claim the win. They were then allowed to replay their game and Paulsen won. I will ignore the initial, uncounted game. Feenstra Kuiper, Gaige and Di Felice all indicate that Rosenthal lost both games by default against de Vere as well as Minckwitz, and Minckwitz lost one by default against Paulsen. These forfeits are not mentioned in the Illustrated London News, the Era, the Westminster Papers or the Chess Players' Quarterly Chronicle. The Westminster Papers of 1 Sep. 1870 (vol.3, p.72), while critical of other contemporary reports, has a crosstable that shows a win and a draw for Steinitz against Rosenthal, but two losses for Rosenthal against Steinitz, and thus a faulty total for Rosenthal. The Chess Players' Quarterly Chronicle simply reproduces part of the report from the Westminster Papers.
 
References
Books
   Di Felice, Chess Results, 1747-1900, page 50
   Feenstra Kuiper, 100 Jahre Schachturniere, page 23, 203
   Gaige, Chess Tournament Crosstables I, page 11
   Reichhelm and Shipley, Chess in Philadelphia, page 142
   Sergeant, Century of British Chess, page 153
Periodicals
   [CPQC], vol. 2, Oct. 1870, page 153
   [Era], vol. 32, 24 Apr. 1870, page 4
   [Era], vol. 32, 7 Aug. 1870, page 7
   [Era], vol. 32, 14 Aug. 1870, page 7
   [Era], vol. 32, 28 Aug. 1870, page 7
   [ILN], vol. 57, 6 Aug. 1870, page 155
   [ILN], vol. 57, 27 Aug. 1870, page 227
   [ILN], vol. 57, 3 Sep. 1870, page 259
   [WP], vol. 3, 2 May 1870, page 4
   [WP], vol. 3, 1 Aug. 1870, page 49, 58
   [WP], vol. 3, 1 Sep. 1870, page 72
Web
   Sericano, C.  [Baden-Baden 1870]

Tournament information updated: 16 May 2018