| Results |
| |
|
Match scores
|
| Name |
Edo |
Dev. |
Score |
/ |
Games |
| Earnshaw, Samuel |
2176 | (72) |
1 | / | 1 |
| Sutton, A.K. |
1849 | (179) |
0 | / | 1 |
| |
| Haselden, H. |
1899 | (73) |
4 | / | 7 |
| Balden |
1781 | (102) |
3 | / | 7 |
| |
| Hill, F.S. |
2008 | (72) |
4 | / | 4 |
| Halford, John |
1997 | (73) |
0 | / | 4 |
| |
| Warren, E.P. |
1871 | (73) |
4.5 | / | 5 |
| Buncher, W. |
1525 | (132) |
0.5 | / | 5 |
| |
| Best, Thomas |
2014 | (66) |
4.5 | / | 7 |
| Hill, H.S. |
1918 | (81) |
2.5 | / | 7 |
| |
| Fry, H.A. |
1912 | (73) |
4 | / | 5 |
| Stone, J.B. |
1721 | (93) |
1 | / | 5 |
| |
| Kempson, S.G. |
1937 | (67) |
4 | / | 6 |
| Smith, J. Lilly |
1913 | (77) |
2 | / | 6 |
| |
| Earnshaw, Samuel |
2176 | (72) |
4.5 | / | 6 |
| Haselden, H. |
1899 | (73) |
1.5 | / | 6 |
| |
| Hill, F.S. |
2008 | (72) |
4.5 | / | 7 |
| Warren, E.P. |
1871 | (73) |
2.5 | / | 7 |
| |
| Best, Thomas |
2014 | (66) |
4 | / | 7 |
| Fry, H.A. |
1912 | (73) |
3 | / | 7 |
| |
| Lloyd (3) |
1975 | (70) |
4 | / | 7 |
| Kempson, S.G. |
1937 | (67) |
3 | / | 7 |
| |
| Earnshaw, Samuel |
2176 | (72) |
4 | / | 4 |
| Hill, F.S. |
2008 | (72) |
0 | / | 4 |
| |
| Best, Thomas |
2014 | (66) |
4 | / | 6 |
| Lloyd (3) |
1975 | (70) |
2 | / | 6 |
| |
| Earnshaw, Samuel |
2176 | (72) |
2 | / | 3 |
| Best, Thomas |
2014 | (66) |
1 | / | 3 |
| |
|
Event table notes
|
| Event data |
| Name: Birmingham Club Tournament |
| Place: Birmingham |
| Start date: 6 Apr. 1865 |
| End date: Dec. 1865 |
| |
| Notes: |
| This was a 16-player knock-out tournament with 4 wins needed to win each pairing, but in the first round Saunders conceded to Lloyd without playing a game and Sutton conceded to Earnshaw after one loss, and in the final, Best conceded when the score was +2-0=2 for Earnshaw. I am guessing that it was A.K. Sutton at this event, but it might have been G.F. Sutton. |
|
| |
| References |
| Periodicals |
| [CPM], vol. 2, no. 2, Feb. 1866, page 63 |
| [Era], vol. 28, no. 1423, 31 Dec. 1865, page 14 |
| |
