London, England 1871 (5)




Results
 
Match scores
Name   Edo    Dev.   Score  /  Games 
Bearne, W.J.    1823 (115) 1 /
Humphreys, E.E.    2012 (98) 0 /
  Humphreys, E.E. gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Fenton, Richard    2284 (59) 1 /
Smith, Thomas (1)    1900 (144) 0 /
 
Huckvale, James    2160 (83) 1 /
Cole, Alfred    2229 (83) 0 /
 
van der Velde    2034 (114) 2 /
Nash, T.    1408 (166) 0 /
  van der Velde gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Bartrum    1 /
Brand, B.    0 /
  Bartrum gave odds of pawn and move
 
Johns (1)    1812 (123) 1 /
Gamman, E.    1990 (102) 0 /
  Gamman, E. gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Ormsby, H.M.    1947 (111) 2 /
Brain    1851 (140) 1 /
 
Standring    1832 (115) 1 /
Parley    1595 (144) 0 /
  Standring gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Chappell, H.    1734 (161) 1 /
Blunt, Robert    1961 (87) 0 /
  Blunt, Robert gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Down, Henry    2017 (77) 1.5 /
Chambers (1)    1777 (135) 0.5 /
  Down, Henry gave odds of pawn and move
 
Rudderforth    2003 (93) 1 /
Down, Walter    1374 (191) 0 /
  Rudderforth gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Bearne, W.J.    1823 (115) 2 /
Shedlock, James    1523 (136) 0 /
  Bearne, W.J. gave odds of pawn and move
 
Fenton, Richard    2284 (59) 2 /
Huckvale, James    2160 (83) 0 /
 
van der Velde    2034 (114) 2 /
Bartrum    0 /
  van der Velde gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Johns (1)    1812 (123) 1 /
Ormsby, H.M.    1947 (111) 0 /
 
Blunt, Robert    1961 (87) 1.5 /
Standring    1832 (115) 0.5 /
 
Rudderforth    2003 (93) 2 /
Down, Henry    2017 (77) 1 /
 
Fenton, Richard    2284 (59) 2 /
Bearne, W.J.    1823 (115) 0 /
  Fenton, Richard gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
van der Velde    2034 (114) 2 /
Johns (1)    1812 (123) 0 /
  van der Velde gave odds of pawn and two moves
 
Blunt, Robert    1961 (87) 2 /
Rudderforth    2003 (93) 1 /
 

Event table notes

Event data
Name: City of London Club Handicap - Consolation Tournament
Place: London, England
Start date:
End date: 9 June 1871
 
Notes:
For some pairings we know only who won, not what the score of the mini-match was. In such cases, I have listed the result as +1-0 for the winner. This will introduce a small bias, if the score was really +2-1 or +1-0=1, for example. This was a 24-player knockout, but in the first round Shedlock beat W.T. Chappell by default, and no games appear to have been played. In the first round, Forster says H. Chappell beat Blunt, but then Blunt is the one who appears in the second round. Could this first round result have been reversed?
 
References
Books
   Forster, Amos Burn, page 32
Periodicals
   [Era], vol. 33, 19 Feb. 1871, page 2
   [Era], vol. 33, 23 Apr. 1871, page 7
   [Era], vol. 33, 2 July 1871, page 7
   [WP], vol. 3, 1 Jan. 1871, page 139
   [WP], vol. 3, 1 Feb. 1871, page 158
   [WP], vol. 3, 1 Mar. 1871, page 172

Tournament information updated: 10 Aug. 2018