London, England 1890 (2)




Results
 
Match scores
Name   Edo    Dev.   Score  /  Games 
Serraillier, Lucien    2179 (99) 1 /
Ballard, William    2237 (72) 0 /
 
Heppell, James    2216 (68) 0.5 /
Jones-Bateman, Ernest    2304 (60) 0.5 /
 
Vyse, W. Elliot    1986 (79) 0 /
Burroughs, Francis    2025 (68) 1 /
 
Smith, Stephen    2132 (56) 0 /
Chepmell, Claude    2169 (71) 1 /
 
Anger, Frederick    2195 (65) 0.5 /
Gover, F. Field    2118 (66) 0.5 /
 
Jacobs, Herbert    2304 (58) 0 /
Jackson, Edward    2194 (74) 1 /
 
Knight, W.J.J.    2148 (117) 1 /
Jowett, W.W.    1739 (156) 0 /
 
Block, Theodore    2214 (64) 1 /
Lambert, Charles    2243 (44) 0 /
 
Howell, Percy    1 /
Macfarlane    0 /
 
Hooke, George    2286 (69) 0 /
Minchin, James    2143 (58) 1 /
 
Sugden, James    1770 (113) 1 /
Minchin, Charles    2026 (54) 0 /
 
Ross, Thomas    2179 (68) 1 /
Nedeyano    1871 (164) 0 /
 
Stevens, Samuel    2126 (82) 1 /
Pearse, Arthur    1938 (76) 0 /
 
Moriau, Camille    2284 (80) 1 /
Puller, Charles    2045 (101) 0 /
 
Gibbons, Thomas    2120 (40) 0 /
Skipworth, Arthur    2241 (46) 1 /
 
Eckenstein, E.    0 /
Wayte, William    2357 (66) 1 /
 

Event table notes

Event data
Name: City of London - Saint George's Club Match
Place: London, England
Start date: 30 May 1890
End date: 30 May 1890
 
Notes:
A number of players at this event are only tentatively identified, since the report in the British Chess Magazine gives mostly only surnames, and in some cases where initials are given, there is some doubt about their correctness. For example, I am guessing that 'Bateman' was 'E. Jones-Bateman', a relatively strong London player of the time. 'Jackson', I suppose is 'E.M. Jackson'. 'Knight' I guess is 'W.J. Knight'. 'C.E. Lambert' is almost certainly 'C.J. Lambert'. 'A. Block' I am guessing is actually 'T. Block' without further evidence of another player of the same surname but different initial. 'Howell' could be 'P. Howell', 'A. Howell', or 'J.D. Howell', all City of London Club players of about this time, and I really have little idea which played in this event. I am guessing at 'Percy Howell' on the strength of his more numerous mentions in the chess magazines, and the fact that it was he who played for the City of London Club against the Saint George's in 1891. 'Ross' was probably 'T. Ross', as his name is given in many issues of the British Chess Magazine of the time, and I suspect that this is 'Thomas Richard Edmund Ross', who was still playing for the City of London Club in 1909-1910. 'Stephens' I guess is 'S.J. Stevens'. 'Puller' is very likely 'Charles Giles Puller' (or 'Charles Giles-Puller' as he became known). I am also not sure whether Gibbons' initials were 'T.E.' or 'T.C.'.
 
References
Books
   Sergeant, Century of British Chess, page 214
Periodicals
   [BCM], vol. 10, no. 6, June 1890, page 219